《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第42条评析(2)

quatrorziime session du 6 an 25 octobre 1980，ii-39.

[14]see o. lando, and p. a. nielsen，the rome i proposal, 3 j. priv. int’ 1 l. 38 2007，p. 38.

[15]regulation（ec） no 593/2008 of the european parliament and of the council of 17 june 2008，on the law applicable to contractual obligations（rome ⅰ）． [16]see d. p. f. arroyo, current approaches towards harmonization of consumer private international law in americans，iclqvol 58，april 2009，pp.411-425.

[17]oas brazilian proposal, inter-american convention on the law applicable to international consumer contracts and trans-actions.

[18]see a. t. von mehren, and d. t. trautman, constitutional control of choice of law: some reflections on hague, 10 hof-stra l. rev. 1981-1982, p. 35. [19]1991年《加拿大魁北克民法典》第3117、3149和3168（5）条。

[20]如1999年《斯洛文尼亚国际私法和诉讼法》第22条、2000年《哈萨克斯坦冲突法与国际民事诉讼法》第1118条、2001年《俄罗斯民法典》第1212条，以及2007年《土耳其国际私法和民事诉讼法法典》第27和45条，等等。 [21]参见《法律适用法》第41条；《民法通则》第145条；《合同法》第126条。

[22]see m. giuliano and p. lagarde, report on the convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, official jour-nalc 282 of 31 october 1980，pp. 0001 -0050. [23]参见前注[7]，o. lando文。

[24]see r. schu, the applicable law to consumer contracts made over the internet: consumer protection through private in-ternational law？ 5 int’1 j. l.＆info. tech. 1997，p. 200. [25]see neuhaus，die grundbegriffe des ipr, 1962，p. 172，cf. c. lima marques, consumer protection in private international law rules: the need for an inter-american convention on the law applicable to some consumer contracts and consumer transactions（cidip），in bourgoinie, thierry（org.）．regards croises sur les enjeux contemporains du droit de la consommation, yvon blais,quebec，2006，pp. 145-190.

[26]see n. reich, cross-border consumer protection, in hans-w. micklitz, n. reich, and p. rott,（eds.），understand-ing eu consumer law, intersentia publisher, 2009，p. 267.

[27]see g ruhl，party autonomy in the private international lawof contracts，transatlantic convergence and economic effi－ciency，in e．cottschalk，et al．（eds．，），conflict of laws in a globalized world，cambridge university press，2007，p．167． [28]see t．c．hartley，mandatory rules in international contracts：the conlmon law approach，collected courses of the hague academyofintemationallaw266．martinus nijhoffpublishers，1997，p．345． [29]see d．f．cavers，“habitual residence”：a useful concept？，21 am．u．l．rev．1971-1972，pp．475-478．

[30]参见前注[26]，hans-w．micklitz等主编书，第267页。 [31]参见前注[25]，c．lima marques书，第145-190。

[32]see n．reich，consumerism and citizenship in the information society-the case ofelectronic contracting，int．willlelms－son（ed．），consumer law in the information society，kluwer，la haye／london/boston，2001，p．170． [33]参见1980年罗马公约第5条第2款。

[34]oas brazilian proposal, inter-american convention on the law applicable to international consumer contracts and trans-actions. arts. 4 and 5. [35]see h. kronke，applicable law in torts and contracts in cyberspace, in k. b. woelki and c. kessedjian,（eds.），inter-net-which court decides？ which law applies？ kluwer, london, 1998，p. 82.

[36]see 1980 rome convention, art. 5 (2)．

[38]see ucc of usa§1-105，and restatement( 2nd) of conflict of laws § 187(2)(b)，and the unfair contract term act1997 of uk,§27(2)． [39]参见前注[27]，e. gottschalk等主编书，第170页。

百度搜索“77cn”或“免费范文网”即可找到本站免费阅读全部范文。收藏本站方便下次阅读，免费范文网，提供经典小说综合文库《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第42条评析(2)在线全文阅读。