Determining an accurate position for a submm galaxy (SMG) is the crucial step that enables us to move from the basic properties of an SMG sample - source counts and 2-D clustering - to an assessment of their detailed, multi-wavelength properties, their con
Identi cationofsubmillimetregalaxiesintheSHADESSourceCatalogue
9
Table6.Identi cationsummary.
NicknameRobustidenti cation?
NicknameRobustidenti cation?
LOCK850.01 SXDF850.01 LOCK850.02 SXDF850.02 LOCK850.03 SXDF850.03 LOCK850.04 SXDF850.04 LOCK850.05SXDF850.05 LOCK850.06 SXDF850.06 LOCK850.07 SXDF850.07 LOCK850.08 SXDF850.08 LOCK850.09 SXDF850.09LOCK850.10 SXDF850.10 LOCK850.11SXDF850.11 LOCK850.12
SXDF850.12 LOCK850.13SXDF850.14 LOCK850.14SXDF850.15LOCK850.15 SXDF850.16 LOCK850.16 SXDF850.17LOCK850.17 SXDF850.18 LOCK850.18 SXDF850.19 LOCK850.19 SXDF850.20LOCK850.21 SXDF850.21 LOCK850.22 SXDF850.22LOCK850.23SXDF850.23 LOCK850.24 SXDF850.24 LOCK850.26
SXDF850.25LOCK850.27SXDF850.27 LOCK850.28SXDF850.28 LOCK850.29 SXDF850.29 LOCK850.30 SXDF850.30 LOCK850.31 SXDF850.31 LOCK850.33 SXDF850.32LOCK850.34
SXDF850.35 LOCK850.35SXDF850.36LOCK850.36SXDF850.37 LOCK850.37 SXDF850.38 LOCK850.38 SXDF850.39LOCK850.39SXDF850.40 LOCK850.40 SXDF850.45LOCK850.41 SXDF850.47
LOCK850.43 SXDF850.48LOCK850.47SXDF850.49LOCK850.48 SXDF850.50 LOCK850.52 SXDF850.52 LOCK850.53 SXDF850.55
LOCK850.60SXDF850.56LOCK850.63
SXDF850.63LOCK850.64SXDF850.65LOCK850.66SXDF850.69LOCK850.67 SXDF850.70LOCK850.70 SXDF850.71 LOCK850.71 SXDF850.74 LOCK850.73 SXDF850.76LOCK850.75SXDF850.77
LOCK850.76 SXDF850.86LOCK850.77 SXDF850.88LOCK850.78SXDF850.91LOCK850.79 SXDF850.93LOCK850.81SXDF850.94LOCK850.83 SXDF850.95LOCK850.87 SXDF850.96 LOCK850.100
SXDF850.119
indicatesarobust(P 0.05)radioidenti cation. indicatesarobustidenti cationat24µm.
coincidentradioand24-µmemission(bothP 0.1)yieldsreliableidenti cation. indicatesmultiplerobust(P 0.05)identi cations.
closevisualinspectionofthedatarevealsmorethanonegoodidenti cation.
This
procedurewasreplicatedforthe24-µmcounterpartslistedinTables3and4,correctingforblank- eld,backgroundsourcedensitiesof4.5and1.2arcmin 2tolimitsof50and150µJy,respectively.Theresult,shownintherightpanelofFig.2,isawiderdistribution,borneoutbythebest- tGaussian:aFWHMof10.7±1.0arcsec,whenconstrainedtobecentredatα=δ=0arcsec,or α= δ=4.5arcsec.Thelowaccuracyofthe24-µmpositionsrelativetothosedeterminedat1.4GHzcanaccountformostoftheextrawidth.
c0000RAS,MNRAS000,000–000Figure3.Left:Cumulativedistributionofradialoffsetsbetweentheradioandsubmmpositionsforthe62statisticallysecure(P 0.05)radioidenti- cations.Thedashedlineshowsthepredicteddistribution(1 e r2/2σ2
)assumingthatthepositionaluncertaintyinR.A.orDec.isgivenbyσ=0.6θ/SNR,asdiscussedinAppendixB,wherewehaveusedthemeanSNRsforthesample.AKStestyieldsaprobabilityof0.57thatthedataareconsistentwiththemodel.Right:Thesamepredictedprobabilitydis-tribution(dashedline),thistimecomparedwiththecumulativedistributionforall83sourceswithcandidateradioidenti cations(i.e.includingthoseforwhichP>0.05).Thepoor tintheright-handplot–aKStestyieldsaprobabilityof0.0003thatthedataareconsistentwiththemodel–demon-stratestheimportanceofusingthePstatisticto lterthecandidatelistofassociations.
Asasecondwayofquantifyingthisapproach,wecancon-sideronlythesubsetof‘robust’radioidenti cations(P 0.05)
onthebasisthatthisshouldprovidethemostsecuremeasureofthetruedistributionofuncertaintyinthesubmmpositions.Thera-dialoffsetdistributionforthissubsetof62sourcesisshownintheleft-handpanelofFig.3,whereitiscomparedwiththepredicted
cumulativedistribution(1 e r2/2σ2
),usingσ=0.6θ(SNR) 1asdiscussedinAppendixB.Forthiscalculationwehaveadoptedθ=14.5arcsecandSNR=3.17(theaverageSNRforthedeboosted850-µm uxdensitiesofthese62sources).Itisclearfromthisplotthatthepredicteddistributionisinexcellentagreementwiththatobservedforthissecuresubsetofidenti edsources;indeed,aKolmogorov-Smirnov(KS)testyieldsa57-per-centprobabilitythatthedataareconsistentwiththemodel.Forcompleteness,theright-handpanelinFig.3showsthesamepredictedprobabilitydis-tribution,thistimecomparedwiththecumulativedistributionforall83sourceswithcandidateradioidenti cations,i.e.includingthoseforwhichP>0.05.ThesameKStestnowyieldsaproba-bilityoflessthan0.1percent.Theseplotsgivecon dencethattheradialoffsetdistributionofsecureidenti cationsisconsistentwiththatexpectedgiventheJCMT’sbeamandthedeboosted850-µm uxdensitiesoftheSHADESsourcesandthatthereisnoaddi-tionalsigni cantsourceofastrometricerrorinthesubmmmaps.TheyalsodemonstratetheimportanceofusingthePstatisticto lterthecandidatelistofassociationsforrobustidenti cations.
Inconclusion,thereisnoevidenceforsigni cantadditionalsourcesofpositionalerror.ForanSMGdiscoveredinasubmmsurveywhereaMalmquist-typebiascorrectionhasnotbeenap-plied,wecanparameteriseitspositionaluncertaintyasfollows.Itspositionhavingbeendeterminedaftersmoothingwiththebeam,a
circleofradius0.91θ(SNR2app 1/2
,forpower-lawcountsoftheformN(>f)∝f (2β
,βhas+a4))
68percentchanceofcontainingthesubmmemitter(whereSNRappistherawSNR,un-correctedfor uxboosting–seeAppendixB),or0.91θ(SNR) 1ifacorrectionhasbeenapplied.Thesecorrespondtoconventional1-σerrorcircles.
百度搜索“77cn”或“免费范文网”即可找到本站免费阅读全部范文。收藏本站方便下次阅读,免费范文网,提供经典小说教育文库The SCUBA HAlf Degree Extragalactic Survey (SHADES) - III. I(9)在线全文阅读。
相关推荐: